The following downloadable audio file is a sermon preached on the Lord's Day (October 9, 2011) by Pastor Nelson Turner of www.AV1611Reformation.com at Faith Road Baptist Church. Pastor Turner preaching on the Parable of the Two Sons in Luke Chapter 15, shows how the word of God proclaims the mercy of the Lord God to His children; and elucidates a truth contained in the parable that is not appreciated by those who deny the "Doctrines of Grace", or deny the revealed truths of God by embracing universalism. If this is a blessing to you, please write to Pastor Turner at the contact address on the website.
318.The Parable of the Two Sons – Pastor Nelson Turner – 10-9-2011
Showing posts with label Calvinism Doctrines of Grace Bible liberty corruption libertine falsehood predestination depravity unconditional election limited atonement salvation perseverance elect. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Calvinism Doctrines of Grace Bible liberty corruption libertine falsehood predestination depravity unconditional election limited atonement salvation perseverance elect. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
“Agency of Calvin in the Death of Michael Servetus?”
“Agency of Calvin in the Death of Michael Servetus?”
Posted by: Nelson Turner in Uncategorized
Fox’s Book of Martyrs (H.T. Coates and Co., Philadelphia, undated, late 1800’s) Page 475
“AGENCY OF CALVIN IN THE DEATH OF MICHAEL SERVETUS” “It has long been the delight of both infidels and some professed Christians, when they wish to bring odium upon the opinions of Calvin, to refer to his agency in the death of Michael Servetus. This action is used on all occasions by those who have been unable to overthrow his opinions, as a conclusive argument against his whole system. Calvin burnt Servetus!-Calvin burnt Servetus! Is a good proof with a certain class of reasoners, that the doctrine of the Trinity is not true—that divine sovereignty is anti-scriptural,-and Christianity a cheat. We have no wise to palliate any acct of Calvin’s which is manifestly wrong. All his proceedings in relation to the unhappy affair of Servetus, we think, cannot be defended. Still it should be remembered that the true principles of religious toleration were little understood in the time of Calvin. All the reformers then living approved of Calvin’s conduct. Even the gentle and amiable Melanchthon expressed himself in relation to this affair, in the following manner. In a letter to Bullinger, he says, “I have read your statement respecting the blasphemy of Servetus, and praise your piety and judgment; and am persuaded that the council of Geneva has done right in putting to death this obstinate man, who would never have ceased his blasphemies. I am astonished, that anyone can be found to disapprove of the proceeding.” Farel expressly says, that “Servetus deserved capital punishment.” Bucer did not hesitate to declare, that “Servetus deserved something worse than death.” The truth is, although Calvin had some hand in the arrest and imprisonment of Servetus, he was unwilling that he should be burnt at all. “I desire,” said he, “that the severity of the punishment should be remitted.” “We endeavoured to commute the kind of death, but in vain.” “By wishing to mitigate the severity of the punishment” said Farel to Calvin, “you discharge the office of a friend towards your greatest enemy.” “That Calvin was the instigator of the magistrates that Servetus might be burned,” says Turritine, “historians neither anywhere affirm, nor does it appear from any considerations. Nay, it is certain that he, with the college of pastors, dissuaded from that kind of punishment.”
Posted by: Nelson Turner in Uncategorized
Fox’s Book of Martyrs (H.T. Coates and Co., Philadelphia, undated, late 1800’s) Page 475
“AGENCY OF CALVIN IN THE DEATH OF MICHAEL SERVETUS” “It has long been the delight of both infidels and some professed Christians, when they wish to bring odium upon the opinions of Calvin, to refer to his agency in the death of Michael Servetus. This action is used on all occasions by those who have been unable to overthrow his opinions, as a conclusive argument against his whole system. Calvin burnt Servetus!-Calvin burnt Servetus! Is a good proof with a certain class of reasoners, that the doctrine of the Trinity is not true—that divine sovereignty is anti-scriptural,-and Christianity a cheat. We have no wise to palliate any acct of Calvin’s which is manifestly wrong. All his proceedings in relation to the unhappy affair of Servetus, we think, cannot be defended. Still it should be remembered that the true principles of religious toleration were little understood in the time of Calvin. All the reformers then living approved of Calvin’s conduct. Even the gentle and amiable Melanchthon expressed himself in relation to this affair, in the following manner. In a letter to Bullinger, he says, “I have read your statement respecting the blasphemy of Servetus, and praise your piety and judgment; and am persuaded that the council of Geneva has done right in putting to death this obstinate man, who would never have ceased his blasphemies. I am astonished, that anyone can be found to disapprove of the proceeding.” Farel expressly says, that “Servetus deserved capital punishment.” Bucer did not hesitate to declare, that “Servetus deserved something worse than death.” The truth is, although Calvin had some hand in the arrest and imprisonment of Servetus, he was unwilling that he should be burnt at all. “I desire,” said he, “that the severity of the punishment should be remitted.” “We endeavoured to commute the kind of death, but in vain.” “By wishing to mitigate the severity of the punishment” said Farel to Calvin, “you discharge the office of a friend towards your greatest enemy.” “That Calvin was the instigator of the magistrates that Servetus might be burned,” says Turritine, “historians neither anywhere affirm, nor does it appear from any considerations. Nay, it is certain that he, with the college of pastors, dissuaded from that kind of punishment.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
